Showing posts with label Items. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Items. Show all posts

Saturday, 30 January 2021

Firearms in the worldship

So, the worldship is a weird setting, it’s a sword and planet setting, a sci-fi game dressed up as a fantasy game. Overall though I seek to maintain relevance to fantasy weapons in amongst more modern and alien weapons.

As most visitor encounters result in several weapons remaining behind I don't treat these weapons as magic item (in most cases). If I did treat them as magic weapons they would be swimming in magic items very early on in the game given the prevelence of these encounters in this setting. I role on the scavenging weapons tables in ACKs to determine the weapons condition when found leading to many being damaged. A side effect of this is technically these weapons can be enchanted, though I leave this up to players to do not include enchanted modern weapons in treasure tables.

In play I give some disadvantages to modern weapons. The main is noise, if they are used in a battle I give +1 to the next random encounter role in a dungeon. Also I “alert” neighbouring rooms, I check who is there and decide what they do to respond. This still leaves the silence advantage strongly in the court of bows and crossbows.

Also I apply a misfire rule draw from warhammer fantasy, on a natural unmodified roll of 1 or 1-3 the weapon can jam or explode. An explosion destroys the weapon and applies the shots damage role to the character firing the weapon. A jam causes the weapon to lock up and it requires a full turn to clean and repair the weapon outside combat.

They have many advantages, under my initiative rules an aimed shot gains a bonus to reducing the targets armor class. If you're not using those rules a simple -2 to the target's AC suffices. Many have access to the rapid fire rules from plasma rifles in Barbarian Conquerors of Kanahu. The final main advantage is simply range, though in cramped corridors and buildings this is often of little use.

Their are three dominant technology levels on the worldship Gaumont, Terran and Visitor.

Gaumont technology


Gaumont is a renaissance era technology level, in the main they use sword and crossbow. But they have access to automatons that are custom build by craftsman that differentiate them for a standard fantasy empire. Firearms are built by these craftsmen, they use meteor powder as the propellant for their weapons, made of arcane powders and dusts concocted by alchemists that is highly explosive. This is bound with wax and paper into a shot cartridge with the bullet that is inserted down the barrel as a single object.

Their designs take strong influence from terran weapons and include rifling, but they still use breach loaded for its sturdy nature and perceived accuracy. While aware of clip based weapons they do not use them more out of cultural preference. With many fights quickly becoming close quarter melees they use these weapons more as an opening salvo before closing. They use a wheellock mechanism drawing on complex clockwork designs that has been perfected over centuries.

Gaumont firearms jam on a natural roll of 2-3 and must be cleared outside combat. On a natural 1 they explode, doing 1d8 damage to user. Cleaves can only occur if a character has multiple pistols loaded and available and has the fighting style proficiency to access the quickdraw feature of that proficiency.

Terran technology


Terran technology reflects technology of the modern world, slightly into the current future. They use chemical propellants, an artificial variant of meteor powder from the Gaumont empire that is more efficient but has similar effect. They use rifling and are breach loaded with ammunition clips. They jam on a natural roll of one and may cleave so long as ammo is in the clip.

The terran weapons and ammunition are deliberately expensive, representing rarity.

Visitor technology


Visitor weapons are Plasma based weapons in the main. They are presented in BCK and follow all rules within. As a house rule they have access to the armor penetration of other modern weapons in my setting and also benefit from cleaves limited to their clip.

Modern Weapon Summary Table

Cost

Ammo/loading

Ammo cost

Damage

Range Inc.

Notes

Gaumont







Clockwork pistol

100

1/ Cartridge

1gp/shot

1d8

30'

Misfire (1 explode, 2-3 jam)

Clockwork rifle

300

1/ Cartridge

1gp/shot

1d8

70'

Misfire (1 explode, 2-3 jam)

Terran







Auto pistol

250

10/ Clip

5gp/shot 

1d8

60'

Misfire (1 jam)

Submachine gun

500

20/ Clip

5gp/shot

1d8

60'

Rapid fire, Misfire (1 jam)

Auto rifle

600

30/ Clip

5gp/shot

1d10

140'

Rapid fire, Misfire (1 jam)

Visitor







Pistol

300

As crystal

1-5gp/shot

2d4

210'

None

Rifle

900

As crystal

3-30gp/shot

2d6

360'

Rapid fire


Saturday, 16 January 2021

Structural Automatons

In building larger vehicles I have been struggling with the nature of hit points. The largest automatons can still be damages by a sword. Yet when I read the rules for Galleon SHP are used and these can only be damaged by specific sources. Also, Visitor vehicles in BCK follow an advanced form of SHP that makes them significantly more resilient than their hit dice implies, could such rules be applied to an Automaton?

Automatons cannot take immunities to weapons by their nature, they are not magical. But there is a logic to larger automatons potential being immune to normal sized weapons by being a large structure in nature. 

But this “bonus” should also come with a cost, Galleons have restrictions on repairs and movement. A vehicle of this nature would not be a standard automaton in nature. Also to consider, the vehicle rules used on flying saucers and balancing the differences between technological vehicles and automaton vehicles. 

What is SHP?


SHP is mentioned in the sea combat rules in the ACKS core rules and in domains at war. Here I am considering it more in terms of a galley rather than a fort. Under the standard rules a galley can be damaged by artillery (in full) in addition to Gigantic or larger creatures and magic at a rate of 1 damage per 5 hit points of normal damage. This sounds very similar to the visitor vehicle structure rules I explored in the Visitor Trader post. But repairing a galley in the field is limited to repairing 1 SHP per turn with 5 people and can only repair half the damage.

Repairing technological vehicles is not as difficult as repairing a galley. But then advanced material repair options would be available with Alien Parts that make this less concept breaking.

Damage to a galleon with SHP reduces its movement rate proportionately. As such any vehicle using SHP should have its speed reduced at some point, though calculating rates as damage is taken can be a pain in normal play so maybe a threshold would be easier.

Damage from magic weapons is tricky. Structures receive damage from specific sources, and personal scale weapons are not listed. But technology weapons are not considered either. As such I would say the rules I apply to technological vehicles would apply to a mundane structure, that being 1 damage per 5 for a personal scale technological weapon. A squad of visitors blasting at a stone wall with plasma rifles would certainly make a dint. But then in play fighting a flying saucer the question came up “would a magic arrow damage a flying saucer” they are magic but also a personal weapon. I ruled that magic weapons can do 1 damage per 10 to go a little way in between none and zero. This way mundane characters without technological weapons can do something against alien tech, but it’s still very little. I would only apply this rule to vehicles with SHP.

Overall, these rules should not apply to personal scale automatons, only the largest vehicles would have it available. But how large? Using my rule of 5 from the discussion on large sized automatons I would say the limit should be that required to get the maximum weight of an automaton in the gigantic category from L&E +1HD. That is 800 stone at 9HD lifted to 10HD giving 1,000 stone (7 Tons) or 10 HD for a normal automaton.

The Reinforced Structure ability (granting VHP)


As this is not quite the same as the SHP rules from domains at war and applies to automatons, I will refer to it as Vehicle Hit Points or VHP. Applying the rules for VHP to vehicles should be viewed as an optional rule as follows.

At its most basic this is a positive ability costing a full special (*) called reinforce structure. To take this ability the automaton must weigh over 1,000 stone or 7 tons. This grants the damage immunities as follows:

The reinforced structure of this automaton/vehicle is difficult to damage. Primitive personal weapons deal no damage as does any natural attack from creatures of huge size or smaller, though enchanted weapons deal 1/10th damage. Advanced technological weapons, natural attacks from gigantic creatures or larger and magic deal only 1/5th damage. All artillery or technological vehicle mounted weapons and spells that do direct SHP damage do full damage.

A vehicle with reinforced structure that takes up to half its hit points in damage is restricted in its movement and has its move rate reduced by half.

Automatons with reinforced structure can be repaired in the field only up to half their maximum hit points. This requires the assistance of 4 people in addition to the mechanist to perform but otherwise follows the same rules as repairing standard automatons. Full repairs can be performed in a workshop to the value of the automaton following the normal rules.

VHP vs THP


The following table summarises these resistances for SHP types into two categories for vehicle to represent two different tech levels. VHP is used to signify SHP used on a vehicle/automaton hit points. THP is for technological vehicle hit points used in Vistor vehciles.

Damage source

VHP

THP

Environmental

Full

None

Personal weapons - low tech

None

None

Personal weapons - enchanted

1/10

1/10

Personal weapons - tecnological

1/5 

1/5 

Artillary - Wood

Full

None

Artillary - Stone

Full

1/10

Artillary - Technological

Full

Full

Creature - Huge or smaller

None

None

Creature - Gigantic

1/5 

1/10

Creature - Colossal

1/5 

1/5 

Magic - Spells

1/5

1/5

Magic - Spells doing SHP

Full

Full


Applying this to current automatons


This ability is easy to add to a current automaton build that weights over 1,000 stone as you are just adding a major ability. Given this is an optional rule consider the nature of the vehicle, this would logically apply to a tank, but should it apply to a wooden frame aircraft? Either way the current design just adds the following to hack this ability onto it:
  • +5000 cost
  • +5 days to build
  • +1 difficulty to build

Friday, 8 January 2021

Modifying automatons (A.K.A. Junk Bots)

While most mechanists use blueprints and libraries to create perfect designs which they then inflict upon the world some choose a different path. Many have no grand design or form for their automatons and instead cobble together designs based of the works of others to create uniquely new and undocumented automatons. Often samples drawn from destroyed designs are used as insiration leading to cluttered and messy workshops full of broken and junked automatons in various states of disrepair.

Following these rules, a functional automaton must exist that is the primary recipient of the modification. The secondary design may be a sample (destroyed automaton that is usable as a blueprint) or an intact and functional automaton (that won't retain this status for long). If the secondary automaton is functional it becomes destroyed through the modification process and usable only as a sample in future projects. For secondary automatons that are already a destroyed sample they become unusable junk once the process is complete.

Through the modification process the mechanist “designs” a new automaton following the guidelines below, though no blueprint is created. Instead the primary automaton in the process is modified to reflect the nature of the new design. Once completed, this new automaton may be used as a sample for future projects and used as a “blueprint” under the normal rules for samples.

Step 1: Designing the modified automaton

A primary automaton and secondary automaton must be declared, these are the base models. The new hybrid design is referred to as the new design. Once the new design is approved by the judge the primary automaton will receive the changes to make it reflect the new design.

All three designs must have a HD that is equal to or less than twice the mechanist’s level. Additionally, they must all have a number of special abilities less than the mechanist’s level. 

Only special abilities from either of the base designs are available, though they may be removed or reduced as required. Either step through the full design principles or this simple approach from the crossbreeding rules framework:
Hit Dice: The new design must have a hit dice at or between the base models.
Movement: The mechanist may assign the new design the movement capabilities of either or both the primary or secondary automatons.
Armor Class: While the automatons base AC is determined by its Hit Dice it may take AC modifiers up to the maximum of either of the base models.
Attacks: The new design should be assigned the attacks of either or both progenitors. If either or both have restricted or no attacks this should be reflected. The final damage inflicted by the attacks will be scaled up proportionate to the increase in Hit Dice.
Special Abilities: The new design may have the special abilities of one, both, or none of its base models but may only draw on those present in the base models. 

The final design will not be converted into a blueprint but will still require judge approval and should reflect an addition to the primary design or a hybrid design to honour the nature of these rules. The build class level, build penalty time taken and cost should be determined as per a normal blueprint. No test is required to create this new design as a blueprint once created, it moves immediately to the modifying phase that consumes these progenitor automatons.

Step 2 Apply the modifications 

To complete the modification process the mechanist spends time in their workshop modifying the primary automaton to the new design through a build throw. This throw uses the following modifications to the normal build process, and failure destroys both automatons used and any additional parts:

Workshop: The mechanist must have a workshop suitable for the new design, with bonuses to their throw following the normal rules using the new designs full cost as the benchmark.
Cost: The cost increase from the primary design to the new design and reduction of the secondary design to sample or junked. 
Build throw penalty: From the new design. Additional quality materials may be expended through the modification to gain a bonus to the throw as per normal, the limit refers to the total cost of the new design.
Modification time: Half the time required to fully build the new design.

The "junk bot" house rule: Generous judges may allow the secondary design to be “in spirit” only. Using destroyed robots as inspiration for the new build to allow grafting of modern and old designs into a hideous amalgams of technology. The difficulty here is the robot being used was never built as an automaton so strong guidance is needed. I leave this one up to the judge.

Example build: Ballista mounted clockwork stevedore (B-POCS)

This takes the Clockwork Auto-Stabilizing Light Ballista and mounts it on a Pilot-operated Clockwork Stevedore (POCS). This gives an Aliens like power suit with an over the shoulder light ballista mount! Both are covered in machinery to the max, jump on the Autarch Patreon to grab a copy.

We allocate the POCS to the primary and the Ballista to the secondary.

We will use: 
Hit Dice: 5 hit dice, as the POCS.
Movement: as the POCS.
Armor Class: as the POCS.
Attacks: add Ranged attack (10’ multiplier) ##; remove Reduced attack (Half) ####.
I’m hoping that the extra damage covers us for the ballista… The added attack is - 
Attacks: 1 light ballista bolt (1d10 damage, +2 to hit, ROF 1/2, range 120’, effective damage 6). 
add Requires ammunition (light ballista bolts, 1lb/1gp count as an item) ## (not a full #### from the secondary automaton as it only applies to less than half the damage, yes I’m being tight here as its 6 damage not 7.5).
The POCS punch does 8, which is half 15 rounded up, so the full 15 will definitely fit that.
Special Abilities: No other changes applied. 

Final design:
Ballista Mounted Pilot-operated Clockwork Stevedore (B-POCS)
Hit dice: 5 (20 HP, save F3)
Armor class:
Move: 60’ (20’)
Weight: 250 st. (1.8 ton)
Carry: 125 st. (1 passenger, ammunition for ballista)
Attacks: 1 fist (1d8) and 1 light ballista bolt (1d10 damage, +2 to hit, ROF 1/2, range 120’, effective damage 6). 
Positive abilities (total): Automaton immunities *, Increased AC (+3) ###, Passenger (1) #, Ranged attack (10’ multiplier) ##. (* #### ##)
Negative abilities (total): Requires ammunition (light ballista bolts, 1lb/1gp count as an item) ##, Requires operator (mechanist, learned or labor (stevedore)) *. (* ##) 
Cost (net abilities): 12,500 (####)

The upgraded B-POCS design can be built by a 3rd level machinist at a +3 build penalty taking 20 days with a base construction cost of 12,500gp.

The modification requires:
Workshop: to the value of 12,500 minimum.
Cost: 2,500 gp in mechanical materials, if the ballista is functional the remaining parts after modification grant the player a non-function sample for later use. 
Build throw penalty: a build throw at +3, modified by additional workshop value and quality materials.
Modification time: 10 days in the workshop (half the new design).

You now have an artillery mounted POCS perfect for those dungeon explorations where you open up with a ballista then wade into melee… Ahhh the joys of automatons in dungeon explorations.

Tuesday, 22 December 2020

Power is money

For my setting the players are adventuring on a crashed giant spaceship. As such standard gems seemed a little out of place. What I did was replace gems with crystals as a major form of treasure and currency. This is reflected in the treasure allocations from last week's map.

Energy crystals in this setting are abundant given most items were powered by them when the ship was fully operational. But the secret to their creation is restricted to the Visitor admirality and as such they are a limited resource. This makes them the perfect currency. Most quests will be for crystals, they are in strong demand and are the main form of exchange outside of silver based coins minted by the various kingdoms.

Aside from the standard fully charged crystal in BCK I include half and quarter full crystals. Their value decreases disproportionately to their charge with less charged crystals having value lower than their charge. This reflects their lack of endurance when used in technological items, and from a game perspective choice for the characters. All crystals use the same weight categories as gems, so you can carry 1,000 of any type for one stone of encumbrance.

Energy crystal type, charge and values:
  • Dim, quarter charge, 5 gp value
  • Luminescent, half charge, 25 gp value
  • Incandescent, full charge, 100 gp value

To facilitate this in play I altered the coinage and gems tables on the treasure table in ACKS as follows using three terms for crystals in place of the gem types:

Worldship adjusted tresure table

Type

Method

Avg. gp

1000s of Slivers

1000s of Grands

Energy crystals

A

Incidental

275

35% 1d8

None

30% 1d4 stashes

B

Hoarder

500

80% 2d6

None

70% 1d4 stashes

C

Incidental

700

50% 3d4

None

40% 1d6 caches

D

Hoarder

1,000

80% 3d8

None

80% 1d6 stashes

E

Raider

1,250

80% 3d10

15% 1d3

60% 1d4 stashes

F

Incidental

1,500

35% 1d8

15% 1d4

40% 1d6 caches

G

Raider

2,000

80% 3d20

15% 1d3

50% 1d6 stashes

H

Hoarder

2,500

80% 5d12

None

80% 1d6 caches

I

Incidental

3,250

40% 1d6

25% 1d6

50% 1d8 caches

J

Raider

4,000

80% 4d20

40% 1d6

50% 1d6 caches

K

Incidental

5,000

30% 2d8

25% 1d8

25% 1d4 troves

L

Raider

6,000

80% 5d20

55% 1d8

60% 1d6 caches

M

Incidental

8,000

35% 4d6

35% 1d10

30% 1d6 troves

N

Hoarder

9,000

70% 8d12

80% 1d6

80% 1d8 caches

O

Raider

12,000

80% 6d20

70% 2d6

30% 1d4 troves

P

Incidental

17,000

35% 4d6

30% 2d6

40% 1d4 troves

Q

Hoarder

22,000

70% 5d12

75% 4d6

60% 1d6 troves

R

Hoarder

45,000

60% 7d6

75% 8d6

70% 1d4 troves


The three types of crystal treasure types are:

Crystal Stash

1d6 dims
1d2-1 luminescent 

Crystal Cache

1d4 dim
1d10 luminescent 
1d2-1 incandescent 

Crystal Trove

4d20 incandescent

Simplifying coins

My players like hordes of treasure but can be terrible bookkeepers at times. As such I greatly simplified coins for my game. Looking at the historical coinage from Guns at War made me consider alternative coinage. 

The silver Grand replaces the gold coin. This is a large silver piece with the same value as a gold coin (maintaining gp as the standard term to partly avoid confusion). Gold is not easy to find onboard an alien vessel and tends to be reserved for non-coin uses. These coins follow a 2,000 gp to a stone in terms of weight. 

The silver Sliver fits between copper and silver, being worth 1/20th of a gp. Slivers can be tiny minted coins or Grand coins cut into half, or quarters, but they are always reflected in an sp value regardless of their size. They follow a 40,000 per stone weight value similar to the soldi in GoW. This means they follow the same weight to gold value found in gold coins.

The convenience of this is that all coins can be recorded as 2,000 gp per stone, So the value can be used instead of the number, this helps later on to just enable the recording of a single amount.

Tracking treasure

Combining these two changes allows characters to just track four things for most treasure, the gp value of coins (2,000 gp per stone), and the three crystal types (1,000 crystals per stone). This has greatly speed up my inventory checks and maintenance in game. 

This allows me to have vast hordes of treasure in my game and simplify the tracking. Treasure is fun and treasure for XP drives my sandbox style games very nicely. So, the thought of removing this elements completely is not something I want to do. I have played many different games over time that reward attendance for XP, missions for xp and treasure for XP. All create their own style of game and for sandbox play I find the treasure for XP model works really well. To simplify it on my end i keep a running tally on a piece of paper of using the gp value of treasure and monster xp then add and divide the amounts when they get to town, this takes less effort than i originally thought it would once you get in the habit, again the key is to keeping it simple.

Another element common to these treasure types is that many different items enter play through these random tables. In the past I thought of that as a negative, but my players are loving it. Many items are discarded, handed to henchmen or sold off. But the items themselves become a part of the characters advancement. They become prized possessions with a story that help build the characters.